standards / HNK

Standards make AI literacy safe enough to practice in public.

HNK binds academic honesty, evidence quality, and safeguarding into one public standard so tools cannot quietly rewrite student work.

A decision list for using a model in a student task

HNK standards on this page are a practice list, not a published institutional code of a ministry or a university. They tell a teacher or family which decisions must be written down before a student uses a generator on school work. The four decisions are source, personal data, generated-content labeling, and human review. Generic AI-literacy advice and HNK’s current public practice are not the same object: the first is a method anyone may use; the second is what this brand currently asks of a task.

Task decision checklist

Tick in writing. Empty means “not yet allowed”. This is not a legal opinion and not a certification.

DecisionWrite the rule for this taskWhose job
SourceStudent writes; reviewer checks the locator exists.
Personal dataAdult names the ban; student practices the refusal.
Generated-content labelStudent labels; reviewer refuses unlabeled paste.
Human reviewNamed reviewer. Mentors may not replace the student’s sentences.

What stays generic, and what is HNK’s current ask

Source attribution, not pasting other people’s records, and labeling generated text are generic responsible-use moves. They do not belong to HNK. HNK’s current public ask, on this domain, is that those four decisions sit on paper before the first prompt, and that the student can teach the resulting explanation back. That ask is a teaching practice. It is not a claim of independent legal registration or of a government licence.

Safeguarding on a static site is limited: this website does not collect student profiles. Inquiries go to info@hnk.org. Do not attach other people’s identifiers to the first email. English is welcome.