The curriculum is a map of checks, not a catalogue of certificates.

How to use this index

Do not enroll in “all of AI.” Name the failure. If the student cannot speak without the window, that is track 01. If they can speak but will not mark a source or refuse a misuse, that is track 02. If they have sentences but no picture of dependencies, that is track 03. Tracks 04–06 are narrower: numbers that cannot mean what the caption says, making with consent, and public teach-back that keeps the limit in the frame.

These tracks are operating practices, not proof of a published accreditation. Completing a track means a second reader can mark the artifacts listed on that page. It does not mean HNK awarded a credential recognized by a ministry or a university.

What every track still requires

• A human explanation written with the interface closed.
• A limitation the student can defend.
• A teach-back another person can mark.
• No extra personal data collected “for atmosphere.”

The approach page is the shared loop. This index is the fork.

Inputs and outputs a partner can plan around

Typical input: a student question, a short time box, and a rule about what must not be collected. Typical output: an explanation card, a map or limitation note, a revision log, and a teach-back. Mentors review; they do not complete the work. Schools should expect to mark language, not software.

This index does not list weekly hours, prices, or device requirements. Those would be over-claims on a public page without a written agreement. Ask in mail if you need a module brief; the partnerships page describes what that brief contains.

Next action: pick the track that names your gap, or write info@hnk.org with that gap in one sentence. English is welcome.